All sides
Exposing Cook’s fraud is not climate skepticism. AGW is not history’s biggest hoax. Fraud means willful lies about methods, not merely lower ECS estimates.
Read Article →Tag
6 posts
Exposing Cook’s fraud is not climate skepticism. AGW is not history’s biggest hoax. Fraud means willful lies about methods, not merely lower ECS estimates.
Read Article →Scientific fraud is deception, not only fake cells in a freezer. False titles the authors’ own spreadsheet refutes meet standard falsification tests.
Read Article →Cook raters googled authors and mocked skeptics. Fraud plus an invalid method means there is no 97%--no number at all. Results require methods.
Read Article →Cook’s team never answered the fraud case. They claimed blind, independent raters they did not use; without those methods, there are no results.
Read Article →Lewandowsky claimed free-marketeers reject HIV and smoking science. Data show 95-96% agreement; correlations turned assent into “rejection.”
Read Article →Lewandowsky’s moon-landing title is false: 3 of 1,145 endorsed both hoaxes. The paper slanders skeptics and should be retracted as scientific fraud.
Read Article →