<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>José Duarte</title><description>Writings and critical analysis on social psychology, scientific methodology, and measurement integrity.</description><link>https://joseduarte.com/</link><language>en-us</language><item><title>Debunking and Discovery in Social Psychology</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/debunking-and-discovery-in-social-psychology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/debunking-and-discovery-in-social-psychology/</guid><description>Most reported social-psych findings fail replication. Debunking false claims is not second-class science; it clears a path when originals bury nulls.</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2015 01:45:00 GMT</pubDate><category>replication crisis</category><category>debunking</category><category>social psychology</category><category>scientific discovery</category></item><item><title>Is social psychology self-correcting?</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/is-social-psychology-self-correcting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/is-social-psychology-self-correcting/</guid><description>Social psychology has not self-corrected political bias. No hiring or journal fixes exist; “science is self-correcting” assumes machinery never built.</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 03:12:00 GMT</pubDate><category>self-correction</category><category>political bias</category><category>Heterodox Academy</category><category>Alice Eagly</category></item><item><title>Are minorities throttling their efforts?</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/are-minorities-throttling-their-efforts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/are-minorities-throttling-their-efforts/</guid><description>Do diversity primes lead minorities to ease off before tests and promotions? Chronic strategic effort cuts could widen skill gaps; it needs experiments.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 15:50:00 GMT</pubDate><category>effort reduction</category><category>diversity primes</category><category>affirmative action</category><category>achievement</category></item><item><title>Evolutionary psychology must be constrained by evolutionary biology</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/evolutionary-psychology-must-be-constrained-by-evolutionary-biology/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/evolutionary-psychology-must-be-constrained-by-evolutionary-biology/</guid><description>Grasslands survival-memory effects are not Pleistocene adaptations. Invariant scenery is not a selection problem; evo psych must answer to evo biology.</description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2015 00:40:00 GMT</pubDate><category>evolutionary psychology</category><category>adaptive memory</category><category>Nairne</category><category>evolutionary biology</category></item><item><title>New article in Pacific Standard</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/new-article-in-pacific-standard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/new-article-in-pacific-standard/</guid><description>Angela Chen’s Pacific Standard piece on the BBS paper hits a neglected point: Big Five openness items track urban taste more than a culture-free trait.</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:24:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Pacific Standard</category><category>Angela Chen</category><category>openness to experience</category><category>liberal bias</category></item><item><title>The Leon Project</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/the-leon-project/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/the-leon-project/</guid><description>The Leon Project would warehouse social-science data and tagged hypotheses for live meta-analysis. Pooled samples could test effects in minority groups.</description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2015 21:36:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Leon Project</category><category>open data</category><category>meta-analysis</category><category>social psychology</category><category>metadata</category></item><item><title>Muslim Presidents</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/muslim-presidents/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/muslim-presidents/</guid><description>Carson’s Muslim-president veto treats a stereotype as a person. For high office, individual evidence should retire group priors, as Kennedy argued in 1960.</description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2015 18:18:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Ben Carson</category><category>stereotypes</category><category>Muslim president</category><category>JFK</category><category>individual evidence</category></item><item><title>Heterodox Academy</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/heterodox-academy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/heterodox-academy/</guid><description>Heterodox Academy launches against one-ideology academia. Social science needs non-leftists and apolitical scientists so review can catch embedded values.</description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 00:48:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Heterodox Academy</category><category>viewpoint diversity</category><category>Jonathan Haidt</category><category>political bias</category></item><item><title>Needless suffering / call a Mexican</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/needless-suffering-call-a-mexican/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/needless-suffering-call-a-mexican/</guid><description>Untrained faculty mentors inflict needless graduate-student suffering. Global “you suck” judgments are not pedagogy. The author offers to listen.</description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 02:12:00 GMT</pubDate><category>graduate school</category><category>mentorship</category><category>academia</category><category>student mental health</category></item><item><title>What I’ve learned researching the emotion of envy</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/what-ive-learned-researching-the-emotion-of-envy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/what-ive-learned-researching-the-emotion-of-envy/</guid><description>Recalled envy episodes beat canned lab inductions. Sister-to-sister rivalry is a raw elicitor. Measure the emotion by function, not just the everyday word.</description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 01:42:00 GMT</pubDate><category>envy</category><category>emotion</category><category>sibling rivalry</category><category>elicitation methods</category><category>social psychology</category></item><item><title>Hurricanes as imagined, construed, and filtered</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/hurricanes-as-imagined-construed-and-filtered/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/hurricanes-as-imagined-construed-and-filtered/</guid><description>Klotzbach and Landsea find no significant rise in Cat 4-5 storms after better data. Media will hype scare papers and bury this--filtered climate reality.</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate><category>hurricanes</category><category>Klotzbach</category><category>Landsea</category><category>climate media</category><category>Category 4-5</category></item><item><title>Minors, Lewandowsky, and Ceremonial Ethics</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/minors-lewandowsky-and-ceremonial-ethics/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/minors-lewandowsky-and-ceremonial-ethics/</guid><description>PLOS ONE forced a correction, but Lewandowsky kept 14-17-year-olds without prior IRB consent. UWA’s retroactive ethics blessing is ceremonial, not ethical.</description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:24:00 GMT</pubDate><category>research ethics</category><category>minors</category><category>Lewandowsky</category><category>PLOS ONE</category><category>IRB</category></item><item><title>Nimble skepticism (Updated)</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/nimble-skepticism/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/nimble-skepticism/</guid><description>If new evidence kills the warming slowdown, skeptics should drop the identity. Climate is not a team; surface records are estimates, not meter readings.</description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:24:00 GMT</pubDate><category>climate skepticism</category><category>Thomas Karl</category><category>warming hiatus</category><category>identity</category><category>ECS</category></item><item><title>Correction / counting</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/correction-counting/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/correction-counting/</guid><description>One listed Cook paper was mitigation, not endorsement; a welding paper was explicit endorsement. Fraudulent studies have no percentage left to recompute.</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2015 19:50:00 GMT</pubDate><category>John Cook</category><category>97 percent</category><category>validity</category><category>retraction</category><category>climate consensus</category></item><item><title>All sides</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/all-sides/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/all-sides/</guid><description>Exposing Cook’s fraud is not climate skepticism. AGW is not history’s biggest hoax. Fraud means willful lies about methods, not merely lower ECS estimates.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 21:48:00 GMT</pubDate><category>climate skepticism</category><category>scientific fraud</category><category>AGW</category><category>integrity</category><category>John Cook</category></item><item><title>The climate science consensus is 78 – 84 percent (Updated)</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/the-climate-science-consensus-is-78-84-percent/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/the-climate-science-consensus-is-78-84-percent/</guid><description>Qualified surveys of climate scientists put attribution consensus at 78-84%, not 97%. Cook-style abstract ratings are not surveys and should not set it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2015 03:27:00 GMT</pubDate><category>climate consensus</category><category>78-84 percent</category><category>surveys</category><category>John Cook</category><category>97 percent</category></item><item><title>Gays, Islam, and the Virtues of Cognition (Updated)</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/gays-islam-and-the-virtue-of-cognition/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/gays-islam-and-the-virtue-of-cognition/</guid><description>Polls, not sermons, settle whether Muslim societies accept homosexuality. Most do not; executions are real. Ideology that denies the data abandons reality.</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 22:27:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Islam</category><category>homosexuality</category><category>polling</category><category>Pew</category><category>moral cognition</category></item><item><title>Sam Harris, Jon Haidt, and Bias</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/sam-harris-jon-haidt-and-bias/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/sam-harris-jon-haidt-and-bias/</guid><description>Haidt’s certainty-word counts and Harris’s moral science both miss how bias works. Shared blind spots survive peer review when almost everyone shares them.</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:27:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Sam Harris</category><category>Jonathan Haidt</category><category>moral landscape</category><category>bias</category><category>philosophy of science</category></item><item><title>ISPP</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/ispp/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/ispp/</guid><description>Duarte chairs an ISPP session on political bias: Bilewicz on status vs. liberal bias; Duarte on ideological assumptions that quietly wreck study validity.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2015 20:12:00 GMT</pubDate><category>ISPP</category><category>political psychology</category><category>ideological bias</category><category>Jose Duarte</category><category>conferences</category></item><item><title>Ideologically-fueled research</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/ideologically-fueled-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/ideologically-fueled-research/</guid><description>Some psychologists pathologize non-leftists to resolve dissonance. System-justification and green “denial” items smuggle values into purported facts.</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 22:57:00 GMT</pubDate><category>John Jost</category><category>system justification</category><category>ideological bias</category><category>environmentalism</category><category>validity</category></item><item><title>Call for examples of politically-biased research</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/call-for-examples-of-politically-biased-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/call-for-examples-of-politically-biased-research/</guid><description>Wanted: social-science studies that bake ideology into measures. Caricature scales like RWA and SDO, rarely endorsed yet tied to conservatives, qualify.</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 15:33:00 GMT</pubDate><category>political bias</category><category>RWA</category><category>SDO</category><category>caricature scales</category><category>social science</category></item><item><title>Scientific American column on Duarte et al</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/scientific-american-column-on-duarte-et-al/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/scientific-american-column-on-duarte-et-al/</guid><description>Valdesolo covers the BBS paper well. Openness and RWA scales encode urban-left taste; conservatives rarely endorse the cartoon items treated as “high.”</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 17:57:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Duarte et al.</category><category>openness to experience</category><category>RWA</category><category>political bias</category><category>Scientific American</category></item><item><title>Thoughts on Gelman comment</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/april-30th-2015/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/april-30th-2015/</guid><description>Political homogeneity threatens social-science validity because ideologies smuggle human-nature assumptions into measures. Diversity is an epistemic tool.</description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2015 22:42:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Andrew Gelman</category><category>political diversity</category><category>validity</category><category>BBS paper</category><category>social science</category></item><item><title>Don’t be a skeptic / the noun problem</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/dont-be-a-skeptic-the-noun-problem/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/dont-be-a-skeptic-the-noun-problem/</guid><description>Prefer the adjective: be skeptical of a claim, not “a skeptic.” Nouns become tribes. Evidence can move; identities resist. “Denier” is not a trait.</description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2015 23:10:00 GMT</pubDate><category>skepticism</category><category>identity</category><category>climate</category><category>motivated reasoning</category><category>denier</category></item><item><title>How not to report science</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/how-not-to-report-science/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/how-not-to-report-science/</guid><description>Scientific American attacked Nic Lewis on aerosol forcing without quoting him. One-sided climate coverage is advocacy, not science journalism.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 23:54:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Scientific American</category><category>Nic Lewis</category><category>Bjorn Stevens</category><category>climate journalism</category><category>ECS</category></item><item><title>Spending money on experiences instead of objects makes you happier</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/spending-money-on-experiences-instead-of-objects-makes-you-happier/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/spending-money-on-experiences-instead-of-objects-makes-you-happier/</guid><description>Experiences beat objects for 57% of people--and things won for 34%. Happiness headlines hide large minorities; the spend-on-trips advice is not universal.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 01:48:00 GMT</pubDate><category>experiential purchases</category><category>happiness</category><category>Gilovich</category><category>Van Boven</category><category>main effects</category></item><item><title>The “hottest year on record” fallacy</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/hottest-year-on-record/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/hottest-year-on-record/</guid><description>On a temperature plateau, any year has a decent shot at “hottest on record.” That slogan does not refute a pause; some scientists botched the probability.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:27:00 GMT</pubDate><category>hottest year on record</category><category>warming pause</category><category>probability</category><category>climate media</category></item><item><title>Why eight fingers would (probably) increase Type-1 error</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/eight-fingers-and-more-type-1-error/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/eight-fingers-and-more-type-1-error/</guid><description>A base-8 culture would likely set alpha at “0.04,” equal to 0.0625 in base-10. Looser cutoffs would publish more false positives. Ten fingers shaped 0.05.</description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:12:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Type I error</category><category>p-value threshold</category><category>number bases</category><category>statistical convention</category></item><item><title>p-values banned</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/p-values-banned/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/p-values-banned/</guid><description>Basic and Applied Social Psychology banned p-values and confidence intervals. Descriptive stats outrank inferential ones; a small p is not an effect.</description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:54:00 GMT</pubDate><category>p-values</category><category>BASP</category><category>confidence intervals</category><category>descriptive statistics</category></item><item><title>37.5%</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/375/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/375/</guid><description>Inbar and Lammers: 37.5% of social psychologists would discriminate against conservative job candidates. On committees that rate is likely career-ending.</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:24:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Inbar and Lammers</category><category>political discrimination</category><category>social psychology</category><category>viewpoint diversity</category></item><item><title>Hot off the presses</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/hot-off-the-presses/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/hot-off-the-presses/</guid><description>Two JPSP papers: Finkel et al. weigh false-positive reform against misses; Waytz et al. find that mental simulation raises reported meaning in life.</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 04:42:00 GMT</pubDate><category>JPSP</category><category>relationship science</category><category>mental simulation</category><category>meaning in life</category><category>replication reform</category></item><item><title>Envy, social comparison, non-envy</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/envy-social-comparison-non-envy/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/envy-social-comparison-non-envy/</guid><description>Hostility to outspoken idealists often sounds like “she thinks she’s better than us.” That comparison sting resembles malicious envy and is understudied.</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:57:00 GMT</pubDate><category>envy</category><category>social comparison</category><category>Judith Curry</category><category>malice</category><category>idealism</category></item><item><title>SPSP; data</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/spsp-data/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/spsp-data/</guid><description>SPSP’s integrity symposium is a draw. Student samples weaken claims; invalid methods make data cheap. Field and workplace samples would travel farther.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 19:40:00 GMT</pubDate><category>SPSP</category><category>scientific integrity</category><category>student samples</category><category>research methods</category></item><item><title>Sweet things</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/sweet-things/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/sweet-things/</guid><description>Latent class models beat linear correlations by keeping respondent profiles intact. Also needed: self-esteem scales that do not smuggle in narcissism.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:10:00 GMT</pubDate><category>latent class modeling</category><category>self-esteem</category><category>narcissism</category><category>psychometrics</category></item><item><title>On fraud</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/on-fraud/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/on-fraud/</guid><description>Scientific fraud is deception, not only fake cells in a freezer. False titles the authors’ own spreadsheet refutes meet standard falsification tests.</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>scientific fraud</category><category>falsification</category><category>Lewandowsky</category><category>John Cook</category><category>research misconduct</category></item><item><title>Methods</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/methods/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/methods/</guid><description>To learn why skeptics think as they do, read their own accounts--not a blog survey that ties them to moon-hoax items almost none of them endorse.</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:36:00 GMT</pubDate><category>survey methods</category><category>climate skeptics</category><category>Lewandowsky</category><category>validity</category></item><item><title>Structure of Malpractice 1: The Frog Jump</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/structure-of-malpractice-1-the-frog-jump/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/structure-of-malpractice-1-the-frog-jump/</guid><description>The frog jump: correlate a lopsided agree/disagree scale, then report the empty opposite pole. Linear r on dichotomous items can invert the truth.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:54:00 GMT</pubDate><category>frog jump</category><category>Likert scales</category><category>correlation misuse</category><category>psychometrics</category></item><item><title>Significance</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/significance/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/significance/</guid><description>Statistical significance is not binary. The 0.05 cutoff is a ten-finger convention for Type-1 control--not proof a hypothesis is true in nature.</description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2015 20:24:00 GMT</pubDate><category>p-values</category><category>statistical significance</category><category>Type I error</category><category>null hypothesis</category></item><item><title>On prestige of universities vs. graduate programs</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/on-prestige-of-universities-vs-graduate-programs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/on-prestige-of-universities-vs-graduate-programs/</guid><description>University brand is not graduate-program quality. ASU social psychology is elite; public-ivy prestige tracks undergrad selectivity, not the PhD shop.</description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:10:00 GMT</pubDate><category>graduate school</category><category>ASU</category><category>program prestige</category><category>PhD admissions</category></item><item><title>Comment on Verheggen et al.; climate consensus research</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/comment-on-verheggen-et-al-climate-consensus-research/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/comment-on-verheggen-et-al-climate-consensus-research/</guid><description>Verheggen et al. invited non-climate authors and cannot say who answered. Consensus research is often junk; valid surveys still show a real majority.</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 23:40:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Verheggen</category><category>climate consensus</category><category>ES&amp;T</category><category>survey methods</category><category>AGW</category></item><item><title>I was denied admission to a PhD program because of my perceived political views: reflections of a sellout; how diversity would strengthen social science (Updated)</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/i-was-denied-admission-to-a-phd-program-because-of-my-perceived-political-views-reflections-of-a-sellout-how-diversity-would-strengthen-social-science/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/i-was-denied-admission-to-a-phd-program-because-of-my-perceived-political-views-reflections-of-a-sellout-how-diversity-would-strengthen-social-science/</guid><description>A PhD program rejected the author after a Jimmy Carter critique. Viewpoint discrimination harms validity; social science needs heterodox voices.</description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:40:00 GMT</pubDate><category>viewpoint discrimination</category><category>graduate admissions</category><category>political bias</category><category>BBS paper</category></item><item><title>How one paleo-participant can change the outcome of a study</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/how-one-paleo-participant-can-change-the-outcome-of-a-study/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/how-one-paleo-participant-can-change-the-outcome-of-a-study/</guid><description>A 32,757-year-old in Lewandowsky’s PLOS ONE file erased real age correlations. Minors stayed in; authors knew for a year and still reported false results.</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2015 02:10:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Lewandowsky</category><category>PLOS ONE</category><category>outliers</category><category>minors</category><category>research ethics</category></item><item><title>New Yorker article</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/new-yorker-article/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/new-yorker-article/</guid><description>Konnikova’s New Yorker piece frames the BBS paper as anti-Republican bias. The deeper problem is one academic subculture’s assumptions in methods.</description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2014 21:57:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Maria Konnikova</category><category>viewpoint diversity</category><category>BBS paper</category><category>social psychology</category></item><item><title>Heritability of academic prowess</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/heritability-of-academic-prowess/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/heritability-of-academic-prowess/</guid><description>Twin data put GCSE scores about 62% heritable, traits 35-58%. Heritability is variance explained, not destiny; ideas and settings can still shift it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:20:00 GMT</pubDate><category>heritability</category><category>twin studies</category><category>academic achievement</category><category>genetics</category><category>GCSE</category></item><item><title>Lewis and Curry</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/lewis-and-curry/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/lewis-and-curry/</guid><description>Lewis and Curry put climate sensitivity near 1.64C, far below many IPCC figures. If that holds, warming was overstated; ECS estimates keep moving.</description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 04:30:00 GMT</pubDate><category>equilibrium climate sensitivity</category><category>Nic Lewis</category><category>Judith Curry</category><category>ECS</category></item><item><title>Your mileage may vary</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/your-mileage-may-vary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/your-mileage-may-vary/</guid><description>Smiling raised happiness for some people and lowered it for others. Main effects mislead; a significant r can ride on a small slice of a sample.</description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 00:15:00 GMT</pubDate><category>smiling</category><category>happiness</category><category>main effects</category><category>individual differences</category><category>correlations</category></item><item><title>No results</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/no-results/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/no-results/</guid><description>Cook raters googled authors and mocked skeptics. Fraud plus an invalid method means there is no 97%--no number at all. Results require methods.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 04:57:00 GMT</pubDate><category>John Cook</category><category>validity</category><category>methods</category><category>97 percent</category><category>scientific fraud</category></item><item><title>Classifying words during sleep</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/classifying-words-during-sleep/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/classifying-words-during-sleep/</guid><description>Sleeping brains still sorted new animal vs. object words, Kouider’s EEG study found. Meaning extraction continued after subjects drifted off.</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 04:36:00 GMT</pubDate><category>sleep</category><category>EEG</category><category>Sid Kouider</category><category>word classification</category><category>neuroscience</category></item><item><title>The art of evasion</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/the-art-of-evasion/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/the-art-of-evasion/</guid><description>Cook’s team never answered the fraud case. They claimed blind, independent raters they did not use; without those methods, there are no results.</description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 02:40:00 GMT</pubDate><category>John Cook</category><category>rater blindness</category><category>scientific fraud</category><category>ERL</category><category>97 percent</category></item><item><title>Harms</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/harms/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/harms/</guid><description>Have you been harmed after being labeled a climate skeptic? The post asks whether Lewandowsky’s false hoax links leaked into work and dating.</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2014 00:30:00 GMT</pubDate><category>climate skeptics</category><category>discrimination</category><category>Lewandowsky</category><category>social stigma</category></item><item><title>Medical records hacked</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/medical-records-hacked/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/medical-records-hacked/</guid><description>A 4.5-million-record hospital hack shows clinics lack real infosec. Assume records are compromised, and watch what you write on intake forms.</description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2014 00:42:00 GMT</pubDate><category>healthcare hack</category><category>medical privacy</category><category>infosec</category><category>patient records</category></item><item><title>Cooking stove use, housing associations, white males, and the 97%</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/cooking-stove-use-housing-associations-white-males-and-the-97/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/cooking-stove-use-housing-associations-white-males-and-the-97/</guid><description>Cook et al. coded stove surveys, housing papers, and TV-news studies as AGW endorsement. The 97% figure is fraudulent and should be retracted.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 21:15:00 GMT</pubDate><category>John Cook</category><category>97 percent</category><category>ERL</category><category>Daniel Kammen</category><category>climate consensus fraud</category></item><item><title>Eyes in space</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/eyes-in-space/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/eyes-in-space/</guid><description>In-space 3-D printed mirrors could beat launch limits on telescopes. Bigger monolithic apertures would image exoplanet air and hunt for life.</description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2014 03:10:00 GMT</pubDate><category>space telescopes</category><category>3D printing</category><category>exoplanets</category><category>James Webb</category><category>aperture</category></item><item><title>Kenny and The Castle</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/kenny-and-the-castle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/kenny-and-the-castle/</guid><description>Australia’s comedies The Castle and Kenny radiate a beautiful sense of life. Both films treat everyday dignity with rare metaphysical optimism.</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 03:42:00 GMT</pubDate><category>The Castle</category><category>Kenny</category><category>Australian film</category><category>sense of life</category></item><item><title>Data is often overrated</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/data-is-overrated/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/data-is-overrated/</guid><description>Invalid studies need no new data to be vacated. Logic can refute Napier &amp; Jost and Lewandowsky; more numbers cannot rescue a validity collapse.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 04:27:00 GMT</pubDate><category>validity</category><category>epistemology</category><category>Napier and Jost</category><category>Lewandowsky</category><category>scientific method</category></item><item><title>Reality is what it is</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/reality-is-what-it-is/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/reality-is-what-it-is/</guid><description>Unflattering findings about conservatives are not automatically invalid. Reality is whatever it is; Eidelman et al. looks methodologically clean.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:48:00 GMT</pubDate><category>conservatism</category><category>low-effort thought</category><category>validity</category><category>Eidelman</category><category>social psychology</category></item><item><title>More fraud</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/more-fraud/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/more-fraud/</guid><description>Lewandowsky claimed free-marketeers reject HIV and smoking science. Data show 95-96% agreement; correlations turned assent into “rejection.”</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 16:57:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Lewandowsky</category><category>HIV</category><category>smoking</category><category>free markets</category><category>scientific fraud</category></item><item><title>The greatest line ever</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/the-greatest-line-ever/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/the-greatest-line-ever/</guid><description>Life’s line “Maybe she’s a real angel with fake wings” models clean logic and optimism. It sidesteps the representativeness heuristic neatly.</description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2014 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Life TV series</category><category>logic</category><category>representativeness heuristic</category><category>romanticism</category></item><item><title>Lewandowsky fraud</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/lewandowsky-fraud/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/lewandowsky-fraud/</guid><description>Lewandowsky’s moon-landing title is false: 3 of 1,145 endorsed both hoaxes. The paper slanders skeptics and should be retracted as scientific fraud.</description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2014 00:57:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Stephan Lewandowsky</category><category>Psychological Science</category><category>moon landing</category><category>scientific fraud</category></item><item><title>Ignore climate consensus studies based on random people rating journal article abstracts.</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/ignore-climate-consensus-studies-based-on-random-people-rating-journal-article-abstracts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/ignore-climate-consensus-studies-based-on-random-people-rating-journal-article-abstracts/</guid><description>Cook’s 97% paper counted stove surveys and psychology abstracts as climate endorsement. Activist raters cannot measure a scientific consensus.</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 22:36:00 GMT</pubDate><category>John Cook</category><category>97 percent</category><category>climate consensus</category><category>abstract rating</category></item><item><title>What’s going on with Paul Krugman?</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/something-is-wrong-with-paul-krugman/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/something-is-wrong-with-paul-krugman/</guid><description>Krugman invents a one-for-one GDP claim Pielke never made, then savages him. Disagreement is not stupidity; scholars should not revel in malice.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2014 04:48:00 GMT</pubDate><category>Paul Krugman</category><category>Roger Pielke Jr.</category><category>Kaya Identity</category><category>climate policy</category></item><item><title>But climate scientist so-and-so says it’s not a big deal...</title><link>https://joseduarte.com/blog/but-climate-scientist-so-and-so-says-its-not-a-big-deal/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://joseduarte.com/blog/but-climate-scientist-so-and-so-says-its-not-a-big-deal/</guid><description>Reading only dissenting climate scientists is confirmation bias. Weigh the majority view too; contrarians remain useful even if they are wrong.</description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2014 00:05:00 GMT</pubDate><category>confirmation bias</category><category>climate consensus</category><category>climate skeptics</category><category>Judith Curry</category></item></channel></rss>